AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Bridgerton simon infertility11/22/2023 "It was only as years passed and we gained new understanding of consent that people started to question her actions.” “It was shocking, but no one seemed to feel that Daphne had done anything morally wrong [when The Duke and I was published} ,” Quinn told BooksandKrys. But in a November exchange with romance vlogger BooksandKrys, the novelist explained that in her opinion, it's difficult to apply our 21st century knowledge of consent to 1813 when the story takes place, a time when Simon had ownership and power over Daphne just because they were married. In reference to the on-screen version, Page tells : "I was very happy that we had a different scene in the TV show than in the book."įor her part, Quinn made consent between her characters a priority in her work that followed The Duke and I. I can make love to him and capture his seed and he'll never know. She hadn't looked at him and thought- he's probably still drunk. She supposed she should be, but she wasn't. She could have whatever she wanted." "Daphne had aroused him in sleep, taken advantage of him while he was slightly intoxicated, and held him to her while he poured his seed into her. He was asleep, and probably still more more than a little bit drunk, and she could do whatever she wanted with him. Passages from the scene, which takes place in chapter 18, read: "He was in her control, she realized. In the book, Simon was drunk and asleep when Daphne initiated sex, and he was clearly non-consenting. However, The Duke and I paints a slightly more succinct picture of the situation. This very same scene in the novel has been inspiring intense discussion amongst readers since its publication in 2000. The creators of the series should have, in fact, seen this coming, thanks to the book season 1 of Bridgerton is based upon: The Duke and I by Julia Quinn. Regardless, in my opinion, it should have never existed in the first place. The other side argues that this scene is plain and simple: it depicts rape. One side offers the possibility that the couple mutually consented Simon simply lost willpower on his own account, while Daphne took the opportunity to empower herself in a society that put women at a sexual disadvantage. On social media, articles, and amongst my own family and friends, I've seen the moment spark intense debate. Yes, Simon was clearly a willing participant at first-up until the point where Daphne knowingly (and somewhat forcibly) took control, preventing him from doing the very thing she knew he wanted to do: withdraw before climaxing. The scene is mired with dubious consent, muddled with grey areas that left me considering whether or not Daphne assaulted her husband. What follows is an estrangement that nearly breaks their marriage, as the couple waits to see whether or not Daphne is "with child." You seized an opportunity, so I did the very same," Daphne responds. "How could you?" he asks in disbelief afterwards.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |